Search for: "Ye Li"
Results 2301 - 2320
of 3,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm
Yes, dear dinner party guests, there are good reasons why lawyers don’t “believe”. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
Bates said yes. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:23 am
“But, yes, there was a book about 30 years ago. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 8:11 am
Praline: Yes, you did! [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 12:30 pm
Yes, says the Fifth Circuit, and with great dispatch, as this has been pending for over seven years. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
But make no mistake, Justice Gorsuch and the other conservatives lied about the facts of this case.5) Black Santas and KKK ChildrenDuring the oral argument in 303 Creative, a suit brought by a woman who says her religion requires her to refuse to offer web design services for same-sex weddings, the hypotheticals were flying 30,000 feet above any real connection to any actual legal principle that might help decide the case. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
” To be sure, we did not fare too well either on the countless times we said “yes,” particularly since 1988. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
And yes, there have been huge disinformation problem areas as YouTube, Tik Tok, Twitch and certain parts of Facebook have all proven vulnerable to disinformation and slower to respond. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:47 am
If you answer yes to any of them, read on. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 9:12 am
by Neil H. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Addressing the question of whether Dish’s PTA service is directly infringing Fox’s copyrights, the Circuit agreed with Gee that Dish’s mass copying of Fox’s programs was akin to the copying in the Second Circuit’s 2008 Cablevision case (yes, the same Cablevision successfully relied upon by Aereo). [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Here are some examples taken from the book: ‘sometimes populist governments act in anti-constitutional ways and sometimes they do not’ (p 38); ‘the claim that populists are anti-pluralist requires empirical support that hasn’t been provided yet’ (p 66); ‘sometimes populists treat all opposition as legitimate’, ‘sometimes populists treat opposition as ordinary political disagreement’ (p 68); ‘“leaderism” is neither always… [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 11:35 am
The response would be, 'Yes, but that doesn't work anymore. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:58 am
That the editors try piously to tie this to the possible death of democracy only makes it more embarrassing.None of which is to say that there are not situations in which people overreact (in my judgment) or where people choose their words more carefully or, yes, choose not to speak. [read post]
16 May 2020, 6:30 am
I’m not an Originalist; I’m a historian, and my historical expertise lies not so much in the parsing of judicial decisions but in the interaction of formal law with historical events – and in particular, with the cataclysmic reality of the Civil War. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
CJEU's response: Yes – but only where in making that distinction, the national legislation is consistent with the principle of equal treatment.It is for the national court to decide whether the detachable and non-detachable media in question are comparable. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Yes, he does, and it is of interest. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:09 am
It is easy to recommend this policy; the difficulty inevitably lies in its execution. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 7:00 am
The biggest concern lies in threats to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of “any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,” and related matters. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
Yes it is a problem. [read post]
