Search for: "COOPER v. LONG"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 3,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
However, if we recognize that 5% is not a magic line, then the choice between one tail and two is less important—as long as the choice and its effect on the p-value are made explicit. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:55 pm
In Sosa v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
Madison, Gibbons v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
Madison, Gibbons v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Cooper (5-4) and Missouri v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
I am a long-term member of the Jury Charge committee of my state bar in the United States, a committee that writes the legal instructions to the jury in civil cases, and was thus very pleased to observe the closing arguments and the Judge’s summing up to the jury in the recent trial of Cooper v Evening Standard and Associated Newspapers, a civil jury trial that arose from a newspaper article that incorrectly reported that Mr. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
In this case, as with Hart v Cooper in B.C., Mr. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
Finally, it should be noted that, in contrast to the position in Northern Ireland, the damages awarded in privacy cases have often been substantial (see, for example, Cooper v Turrell ([2011] EWHC 3269 (QB) and see our case comment). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:56 am
So Anderson Cooper is gay. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
This clarifies an aspect of South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
E.g., Green v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
The facts are longs and rather detailed. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:34 am
Mata v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Based on such a right to issue instructions, the board of a government-owned company could be obligated to employ certain people, purchase or sell certain assets, enter into or terminate a certain cooperation, etcetera. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:15 am
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:05 am
If that doesn’t happen, the Medicaid case is going to be an extremely important ruling no matter who wins; probably the most important Spending Clause case since the 1930s, or at least since South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
Waco Tribune-Herald by Cindy V. [read post]
