Search for: "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 8,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 8:22 pm
Beginning today, the E-Verify Self Check service is available to users who maintain an address and are physically located in Arizona, Idaho, Colorado, Mississippi, Virginia or the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:56 am
At this time, the service is only available to residents of Arizona, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Idaho, Mississippi and Virginia. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:49 am
Cases involving permanent injuries to kids are some of the most difficult cases that Maryland and District of Columbia medical malpractice lawyers pursue because they usually involve multiple expert witnesses, such as obstetricians, pediatric neurologists, neonatologists, placental pathologists, life care planners and economists. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:25 am
Professor Musalo has represented other abused women seeking asylum and recently took up the case of L.R.The immigration lawyers at Livesay & Myers, P.C. represent clients in Woodbridge, Manassas, Stafford, Alexandria, Arlington, Fredericksburg, Fairfax and all of Northern Virginia, as well as throughout Maryland and the District of Columbia, in asylum and other immigration law matters. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:56 pm
At this time, the service is only available to residents of Arizona, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Idaho, Mississippi and Virginia. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:46 am
Easterbrook’s approach emphasized the imperative need for lower court deference to the Supreme Court’s explicit Reconstruction Era holdings that the Second Amendment does not bind the states, even after the Supreme Court’s game-changing decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down last year and in 2004, according to the Public Citizen, which challenged those ineffective regulations. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 5:10 pm
The other 17 states and the District of Columbia have a range of non document requirements instead. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:13 pm
Also, 22 states (and the District of Columbia) prohibit sexual orientation discrimination in employment, and 12 additional states prohibit sexual orientation discrimination in government employment. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:15 am
Melcher is a licensed attorney and an active member of the District of Columbia Bar with more than a decade of experience practicing law in the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
”With respect to the Second Amendment argument, the Court pointed to the language in District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:18 pm
Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia; Robert C. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 pm
Of particular relevance to the Columbia University case, it is also how Harvard University has routinely assembled property it needed in the Boston area. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (S.D.N.Y. 2011) back in August. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (S.D.N.Y. 2011) back in August. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
” “This decision and its predecessor — the District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:26 am
Two days prior to the agreement, Purdue Pharma, LP, said it would pay $19.5 million to resolve allegations that it persuaded physicians to overprescribe OxyContin in 26 states across the United States, as well as the District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to reverse its August ruling requiring court warrants to affix GPS devices to vehicles to track their every move. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia—one on behalf of a mother from Guatemala released from custody but not yet reunited with her son, and one on behalf of three migrant parents separated from their children in detention. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 11:50 am
District Court for the District of Columbia had previously held that the House of Representatives suffered no concrete injury from the funding’ decision. [read post]
