Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 2321 - 2340 of 6,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm by Aaron Pelley
Sandoval: The Court found that in light of the United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:37 am by Lawrence Solum
This Article examines the ways in which the political economy of criminal litigation - specifically, the material conditions that determine which litigants are able to raise criminal procedure claims, and which of those litigants’ cases are appealed to the United States Supreme Court - has influenced these shifts. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Radley Balko] “If you ignore levels, and just look at rates of change, crime rates in Canada track those in the United States to an astonishing degree. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
 It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm by admin
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by Terry Lenamon
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Brasher, 776 S.W.2d 567, 570 (Tex. 1989) (explaining that "[a]ll assertions of opinion are protected by the first amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Texas Constitution"). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Efforts made by Chinese enterprises operating in the United States to comply with PRC state secrets laws can create difficulties in complying with US regulations and disclosure requirements. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Many commentators have observed that the case bears similarities to United States v. [read post]