Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 9,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
” §80a–35(b)(1). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:09 am
This is clearly illustrated by paragraphs 35 and 46-48, where the CJEU has for the first time not resisted the temptation to venture into the interpretation of the provisions of the EPC: “35. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:32 am
In an examination of the drivers involved in the fatal car accidents, NHTSA found that drivers ages 21-24 were the most likely to be intoxicated, at 35%, followed by drivers ages 25 to 24 (30%), and then drivers ages 35-44 at 25%. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:33 am
” 35 U.S.C.314(d). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:32 pm
It does not surprise me that their article was selected as one of the 35 best articles published by law firm writers last year. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 12:08 pm
Rule 35 provides in part: (1) In General. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:55 am
In contrast, when considering the issue of inducement of infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 2:50 pm
But a donor in a lower tax bracket does not get the same benefit. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:56 am
§ 35-7-1059(a)(iv) was intended to describe alternative means of committing the same offense and does not support separate convictions for each act constituting the offense. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:15 pm
§ 102(a)(1). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 9:20 pm
School violence often does not enter the formal criminal justice system and is dealt with through public security or other administrative measures, or is not dealt with at all. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:15 am
See MPEP § 2260.01 But, what difference does it make if the independent claim is amended? [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 9:46 pm
So, what does this mean for patents issued more than two months ago? [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
The Whistleblower Act also does away with the $35 million cap on fines for automakers that purposely delay recalls. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:25 pm
True, the Court said, but due process does require that the agency decision provide clear notice to affected parties. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 10:08 pm
Patent law allows a trial court to make the losing party pay the winner's attorneys' fees but only in "exceptional cases". 35 U.S.C. 285. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:25 pm
For example an adult 18-35 year old claimant could allocate a portion of the cash proceeds of settlement to such an opportunity. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 3:09 am
“The required showings of material- ity and intent are separate, and a showing of materiality alone does not give rise to a presumption of intent to deceive. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:25 pm
True, the Court said, but due process does require that the agency decision provide clear notice to affected parties. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 7:05 pm
Which burdens are permitted under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
