Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 3,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 7:15 pm
Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
And your mileage may vary under state or local law. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
Yesterday in Perry v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 12:22 pm
Petersburg Times of Tampa Bay predicts that a ruling in favor of the state in Florida v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
 In fact, a few years back in Poindexter v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:41 am
The Defense Department flagged for deletion mentions of the World War II Enola Gay aircraft and references to people who have the last name “Gay. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
No. 403 v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:51 pm
From James v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:13 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument in American Legion v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:03 pm
The case of Elane Photography v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
(See further discussion in O Gay and H Tomlinson, ‘Privilege and Freedom of Speech’ in A Horne, G Drewry, and D Oliver, eds, Parliament and the Law (Hart Publishing, 2013), 56-57). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
Marcovitz, (Dalhousie Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 153-176, 2009).Dimitry Kochenov, On Options of Citizens and Moral Choices of States: Gays and European Federalism, (Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2009).Heather Kennedy, Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 9:57 pm
Even before Brown v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Griffin, Snyder v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:31 am
In 1993, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a virtually identical state law in Wisconsin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 12:23 pm
" If the state made Smith create a website for a gay marriage—just because she was willing to create one for a straight marriage—that would be compelled speech, which would violate her First Amendment rights. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:56 pm
” Williamson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996), we have now declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign State to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millennia, Perry v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
But Scalia’s rejoinder (not so different from his repeated, inelegant advice to Bush v. [read post]
