Search for: "HARDING v. HAND" Results 2321 - 2340 of 6,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm by Dan Ernst
Standard answers point to New Deal faith in bureaucracy, or an Advisory Committee that was not moved to amend Rule 23 until mounting docket pressures and the desegregation cases of the 1950s and 1960s forced its hand. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 8:55 am by Michael Risch
And the payoff from this is nice, because it allows them to build a model that critically examines sunk costs (holdup) v. switching costs (not holdup). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:55 am by Eric Segall
But then I came to realize that the justices do that anyway whether the precedent at hand is flexible functionalism or the most formalistic formalism. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's petition for an injunction rehearing relating to the second Apple v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:57 pm
Likewise, inability to use the descriptor 'University' would result in loss of the prestige associated with that word and which RUL had toiled so hard to obtain. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:49 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (Fourth Chamber) gave judgment today in Case C-580/13 Coty Germany GmbH v Stadtsparkasse Magdeburg, an October 2013 reference for a preliminary ruling from the German Bundesgerichtshof. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:38 am by John Jascob
The high court said it was "hard-pressed to fault the court for not looking to the deal price as a floor for fair value when the petitioners told the court that synergies only became relevant if the deal price was reliable. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting opinion from Judge Neil Gorsuch on the 10th Circuit, Caring Hearts Personal Home Services, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:23 am by jmalcolm
We will face a hard enough task fighting the expansion of such rules. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The former is given more allowances, with soft and hard materials being left as a choice, but also on the lid design and its shape. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:19 am by Florian Mueller
That is the question that, on the other side of the Pond, the Dusseldorf Regional Court referred to the European Court of Justice in Nokia v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:29 pm by Ron Burdge
The numbers could easily become huge.Owners are filing Lemon Law and warranty breach cases against Ford over the 3.5 liter V-6 EcoBoost engine and claim that it has defects that cause the vehicles to shake, the engine to misfire and the vehicle to rapidly lose power. [read post]
31 May 2016, 6:23 am by Peter Groves
It looks like an open-and-shut case, and as far as infringement goes it is hard to see why on earth it should even have got to court let alone the Court of Appeal.The answer lies in the fact that the likelihood of confusion - necessary, because the trade mark and the defendant's sign are merely similar,  not identical - provided an opportunity to mount a defence. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
”Last year the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board issued a significant panel decision, Patterson v. [read post]