Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 29,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Englert, Jr., which is about as good as oral advocacy gets at this level. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:48 am
Click here to read this decision, Slayton v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:49 pm
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
An instance of compelled speech that rises to the level of a First Amendment violation? [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:47 am
In the recent case of Dant v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm
In Norman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:53 am
Charles and Elgin non-compete agreement attorneys have defended high-level executives in a covenant not to compete and trade secret lawsuits. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
(§4.1(v)). [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
But that does not mean we can continue the present, unaffordable pension system, without enacting measures to reduce costs.I have submitted legislation, known as "Tier V," to address these problems by making certain cost-saving changes for new entrants into the public pension system, while still providing a high level of benefits for public retirees. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Durham v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
Cir. 2013) This design patent decision is interesting and important on several levels and so I have divided the post into two sections. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:20 am
Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:44 am
It also cited its own 2011 decision in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:44 am
It also cited its own 2011 decision in State v. [read post]
