Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 5,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
Army Chief of Staff Mark A. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:47 am
Not good enough, said the Supreme Court of Ohio. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:41 pm
What does the world look like today if you’re Robert Mueller? [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
In re Lawrence Foods, Inc., Serial No. 86937640 (July 20, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
C. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
The State informed Live Gold that its use of the trademarks "The Platters" and "The Cornell Gunter Coasters" might violate the New Jersey Truth in Music Act, which provides in pertinent part:A person shall not advertise or conduct a live musical performance or production through the use of an affiliation, connection or association between the performing group and the recording group unless:(a) The performing group is the authorized registrant and owner of a federal service… [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:20 am
This 100% Natural, non-toxic blend of oils and herb extracts works just like Bee Go® and it smells good! [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:16 pm
As lone and then fellow demonstrator Fat C. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:43 pm
Back at the airport I went through two levels of security: the normal one everyone goes through, and then a second one that certain flights out of the C terminal seem to require. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen:"Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen:"Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 12:16 am
In particular, they alleged that there has been no proper assessment of the impact of the change in law, it is discriminatory as against natural persons, and there is no good reason for it.Sky pointed out that the defence was originally only intended to apply to natural persons but was construed as covering legal entities as well by the CJEU in the Anheuser-Busch v Buddejovickybudvar (C-245/02 [2004] ECR-I-10989). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
C. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
P. 47(c)(1). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:19 am
Good and Laura C. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
§ 9.61.260(1)(c). [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:44 pm
But then there were also the skyscrapers under construction, the newly-paved and well-marked roads, legible and omnipresent street signs, and KFCs and Pizza Huts right behind the H&M and C&A stores and next door to all the kebab shops. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
C’mon IP firms, a fully functioning ASA is good for you too. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:05 pm
Grande marked a sea-change in the Catholic Church in El Salvador. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:41 am
§1052(a), including not just potentially disparaging marks but also those that could fall under another clause of §1052(a) prohibiting a trademark that “[c]onsists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter. [read post]
