Search for: "Matter of Thomas"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 11,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
But not even Justice Thomas would go that far (though he is close to embracing that idea). [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:41 am
Today, of course, three Justices--Thomas, Gorsuch, and Barrett--purport to be strict originalists and the discussion of the topic in legal academia has taken on huge importance. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:16 am
Counsel responded yes, but that the court had transferred the matter. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 3:15 pm
Thomas, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Appellate Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:58 am
NRDC--was a matter of statutory interpretation. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:08 am
Only Justices Thomas and Alito were not going to buy the crap. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Here's what SG Prelogar said in response to Justice Thomas's initial question:As a general matter, we've seen lawsuits in the past that are brought by, for example, prescribing physicians or patients who want greater access to a drug. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:15 pm
The court awarded the fees, approving the $300 rate, and certified the matter for immediate appeal. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:17 am
Thomas filed a separate dissent. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
McCraw.McCraw, Thomas K.Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2012.HJ261 .M37 2012 Legal Professio [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:44 pm
Counsel answered that it didn’t matter – there was a basis for rescission based on the misrepresentation. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
”Clement, a former Solicitor General of the United States, is an excellent lawyer, so he gave the answer that best served his clients: it doesn’t matter. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
In 2013, McClary formed the group “Commodores Featuring Thomas McClary. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:12 am
" {The phrase "All Lives Matter" gained popularity in response to the growth of the Black Lives Matter movement ("BLM"), a social movement protesting violence against Black individuals and communities, with a focus on police brutality. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
The argument suggested that the justices would be deeply divided, and it offered no reason to think that the three justices who voted against the service advisors the last time this case was before the court (Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito) would view the matter any differently this time. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that even if Congress has not expressly preempted state laws – or if express preemption is not determinative because the “loophole” might apply – state laws relating to a particular subject matter may be implicitly preempted in some cases. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
Thomas R. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am
Those matters are for the trier of fact alone. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:31 am
Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. [read post]
