Search for: "National Labor Relations Board, The" Results 2321 - 2340 of 8,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 10:47 am by Michael Lebowich and Laura Franks
Still hard at work as we head into mid-September, the National Labor Relations Board, in a 3-1 decision (Chairman Ring and Members Kaplan and Emanuel in the majority, Member McFerran dissenting) announced a three-step test which clarifies how petitioned-for partial workforce units are analyzed under the traditional community of interest factors. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:28 am by Adam Bennett
In a 3-1 decision, the Board ruled that Kroger did not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it removed nonemployee union supporters from the parking lot of a Kroger store. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 3:41 pm by Randy E. Barnett
More importantly, none bear any relation to the attack that actually occurred on September 11th. [read post]
Where such enabling language is missing from their CBA’s, employers should make the inclusion of such language a high priority for their next labor negotiation. [read post]
During its reign, the Obama National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a number of decisions relying on Atlantic Steel to grant protection to represented employees who voiced extremely profane and racially-charged language in the workplace. [read post]
Specialty Healthcare runs contrary to Section 9(c)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (Act), which prohibits the Board from giving controlling weight to the extent of a union’s organizing when making unit determinations. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 5:46 am by Austin Koltonowski
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on Tuesday issued a ruling relaxing the standards for employers to make unilateral changes to employment terms without the union’s consent. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:10 pm by Leti Volpp
This increases the national security interest in curbing use of this migration route. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 8:56 am by Mike Underwood
However, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has taken one element of risk out of the decision. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:39 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) request for input on protection for employees who engage in profane and offensive speech signals that it may be considering a change in the factors it considers when determining if an individual’s comments go beyond what’s protected by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 11:47 am by Cristina Portela Solomon
We have been discussing arbitration agreements in the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) context lately, particularly with respect to class action waivers. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 11:24 am
On September 5, 2019, over the dissent of one member, a majority of the National Labor Relations Board invited briefing to aid the Board in reconsidering the standards for determining whether “profane outbursts and offensive statements of a racial or sexual nature, made in the course of otherwise protected activity,” should lose their Section 7 protection.1 [read post]
He served as Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board in the Clinton administration and as Chairman of the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board from 2014-2017. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Image by kdbcms from Pixabay Yesterday, the National Labor Relations Board announced here that it wants your input — actually your lawyers will have to submit a brief — “on whether the Board should reconsider its standards for profane outbursts and offensive statements of a racial or sexual nature. [read post]
Does an employer who genuinely believes that its workers are independent contractors and tells them that they are contractors and not employees, only to later find out that it was wrong, violate Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act)? [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 He brings over 12 years of campaign, labor, government and private sector experience to his new role. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 6:10 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
In an August 29 decision in Velox Express, Inc., the NLRB held that employers don’t violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) just by misclassifying employees as independent contractors. [read post]
While much of the country spent the last week of summer enjoying the last few days of sun, the National Labor Relations Board spent the week before its eponymous three-day weekend churning out a couple of important decisions. [read post]
Edge filed an unfair labor practice charge claiming that the driver misclassifications violated the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). [read post]