Search for: "Research In Motion Limited"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 3,047
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am
Of course, new frontiers are not limited to the ivory tower and the laboratory. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Leapfrog Enters., Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Invacare – ALJ Charneski Grants Motion To [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
I might as well just file motion after motion after motion, seek sanctions, notice deposition after deposition, and force the 'mill' law firm to quit the case. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
I might as well just file motion after motion after motion, seek sanctions, notice deposition after deposition, and force the 'mill' law firm to quit the case. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:43 am
The foursome sent letters to Apple, Google and Research in Motion (the maker of Blackberry), asking that the companies remove cell phone apps that identify the location of DUI checkpoints and send warnings to drivers, according to the New York Times. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
Echostar (Patently-O) (IPBiz) (IAM) CAFC reverses District Court’s finding of means-plus-function limitations: Rembrandt Data Technologies, LP v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:06 pm
" No limit to the United States is stated. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:53 am
Add to that an earlier motion and appeal regarding the sufficiency of the notice of claim (a pre-lawsuit filing required in cases again municipalities), credit should be given to plaintiff's counsel, Alan M. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:01 pm
Fortunately, we don't have that space limitation here. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:19 am
This Court's independent legal research has revealed that admissions contained in e-mails may be used in litigation, but only after a court has analyzed carefully several issues, including, but not limited to, the authority and the capacity that the person who made the statement had, in the factual circumstances of the case, for making the particular statement or admission (see, Sea-land Serv., Inc. v Lozen Intl., LLC, 285 F3d 808, 821-822 [9th Cir. 2002] [district court… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
Epic's second summary judgment motion of non-infringement convinced the district court judge, after the first failed because the judge wanted a better feel for the facts. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
Research in Motion, Ltd., 418 F.3d 1282 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:28 pm
There won't be any of those motions for summary judgment. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
While the major law schools and the Maricopa County Superior Court continue to maintain excellent legal research resources and materials, the options are more limited in rural Arizona. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:44 am
The Palm Center brief takes the position that this doctrine is much more limited in practice than in reputation. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:50 am
Famed M & A litigator Ted Mirvis noted that in the recent Airgas case, some documents were limited by court order to "Delaware attorneys' eyes only". [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:10 pm
My attorney filed a motion of appeal and my case went to the circuit court but motion was denied. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:36 pm
Finally, the use of DCIT for depicting the reasoning of legal cases typically used in AI research is considered. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm
Other listed websites included, without limitation, Armenian Issue Blog, Assembly of Turkish American Associations, and Armenian Genocide Debate. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm
(collectively, “Nokia”) and by Flashpoint and Respondents Research in Motion Limited and Research in Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”) to terminate the investigation as to the Nokia and RIM Respondents based on settlement and license agreements. [read post]
