Search for: "STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! "
Results 2321 - 2340
of 9,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
(Cal. 4/4/16), the California Supreme Court addressed a number of questions that arise under the "suitable seating" section of the Wage Orders, which provides: (A) All working employees shall be provided with suitable seats when the nature of the work reasonably permits the use of seats. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 7:27 am
Indeed, Tar Creek is one of the oldest Superfund sites and is today still listed as “undergoing clean up” three decades after its listing. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
(Cal. 4/4/16), the California Supreme Court addressed a number of questions that arise under the "suitable seating" section of the Wage Orders, which provides: (A) All working employees shall be provided with suitable seats when the nature of the work reasonably permits the use of seats. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:11 am
Does Don Quixote's advice to Sancho in the quote up above ring true here? [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:16 pm
While the exemption may speed up the process of judicial review for a stadium, it is at the cost of all other docketed civil cases on the jurisdictional court’s calendar. [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:57 am
" Counsel for Starbucks asked that the Court of Appeal go further, seeking a ruling that plaintiffs without standing should never be allowed to conduct discovery to find a plaintiff with standing, arguing that it was necessary to prevent "encouraging attorney-driven lawsuits and sham lawsuits filed in the names of plaintiffs who are placeholders until discovery can turn up a viable plaintiff. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
The Standford Cyberlaw blog has noted California’s legislative attempts to safeguard net neutrality rules in two posts. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
During the bill’s passage, an Independent Working Group recommended that a stand alone misogyny act be introduced, though this is yet to be timetabled. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 6:00 am
Summing up statutory amendments as either "procedural" or "substantive" generates waves through UCL doctrine after Proposition 64, in contrast to the ripples that might have flowed from a conclusion that the new standing rules are a statutory repeal. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:30 am
But, most states aren’t as employee-friends as California. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:27 pm
Congress has failed for a generation to keep up with the fast-growing dockets in the Federal courts. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:24 am
Interest rates are going up. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 9:19 am
Oklahoma: Medical marijuana will appear be up for a vote by citizens sometime this year. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:32 am
That was up a whopping 30 percent from the year before. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:36 am
As it now stands, marijuana remains illegal under federal law. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:51 am
Governor Newsom for standing up to them… and you should too. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:15 am
City of Philadelphia, California v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:12 pm
Starrett II has been a licensed attorney since 1993 and is a member in good standing with the California State Bar and the San Diego County Bar Association. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Interestingly, there is no standing requirement. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:15 am
Mississippi does not stand alone when it comes to racial bias in marijuana enforcement. [read post]
