Search for: "STATE v BUSH" Results 2321 - 2340 of 4,538
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
 The rule came under relentless attack by logging and resource extraction interests, certain states, and the Bush administration. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:09 am by Kent Scheidegger
  (This is a variant on Judge Friendly's 1970 proposal and an extension of Stone v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:30 pm by Lyle Denniston
Federal Election Commission was the lead case), and the historic fight in 2000 over the Presidency that the Court decided in Bush v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:15 am
The Canadian Supreme Court also made the following clear, at paragraph 50 of a 2002 decision, Suresh v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:37 am by Lyle Denniston
  Recall, for example, that the constitutional fight over who won the Presidency in 2000 (Bush v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:17 pm by Jeff Gamso
  So shut up, all of you.The United States Court of Appeals For the District of Columbia Circuit's opinion today in Abdul Latif v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
 http://katzjustice.com  George Bush I presented us with the "New World Order". [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:12 pm by Patrick
  It Would Be A Tragedy If America’s Death Wish Came To Fruition Before Deming v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:49 pm
"Stated positively, 'municipalities generally have a ministerial duty to keep their streets in repair, and they are liable for injuries resulting from defects after actual notice, or after the defect has existed for a sufficient length of time for notice to be inferred.' Bush v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:13 pm by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking is the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:29 am
If the court does take up a challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the justices will step into a legal battle with political stakes not experienced since their rulings in Bush v. [read post]