Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 2321 - 2340
of 15,319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Decentralizes authorship: the work becomes what’s important b/c it spreads, decontextualized. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 4:02 pm
For example, Person B owns a substance, but has given Person A consent to have it in Person A’s possession. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Adverse possession doesn’t fit b/c of lack of exclusivity. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
§ 636(b)(1)(C). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
§ 636(b)(1)(C). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
The Court similarly found Comptroller’s alternate argument unavailing: that Business should be liable for sales tax as an out-of-state or retail vendor under § 11-701(b) or (c). [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:48 am
Murphy’s book Administrative Law & Practiceis cited in the following article: Daniel B. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm
That’s because her appointment coincided with USDA’s loss of line speed flexibility for the slaughter of market hogs. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
(“A/C” means “on account of). [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 10:44 am
The Supreme Court in R v Grant defined detention under section 9 occurs when law enforcement or the state inflicts a significant amount of physical or psychological restraint that suspends the individual’s liberty interest. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 7:19 pm
[emphasis added; citations omitted] The Ontario Divisional Court recently released a decision in Laforme v. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am
Bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind or intention (Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C‑104/18 P)). [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:32 am
He also found that Magistrates Courts retain the power to adjourn further under s.54 of the 1980 Act, as Mr Justice Mitting found in Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis v Hooper (2005) EWHC 340 (Admin). [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 7:30 am
” People v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:00 am
In a May 11, 2021 status report, the defendants stated their intent to file a dispositive motion striking the FTC’s claim for monetary relief following AMG. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
Gravelle’s Rule 60(b) motion was correct regardless. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:52 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
B. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:01 am
In Duran v. [read post]
