Search for: "State v. Graves" Results 2321 - 2340 of 2,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2017, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
            When the possibility of the husband subsequently making a tactical decision not to read and rely upon the affidavit evidence of his mother at the trial, so as to prevent her from being available to be cross-examined by counsel for the wife, was raised, counsel for the husband’s mother pointed out that the husband would then face grave, probably insurmountable difficulties in his defence of the wife’s application… [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:55 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The criminal charge that an alleged offender faces will depend on the culpable mental state of that person. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by admin
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 11:50 am by Katitza Rodriguez
” Katitza Rodriguez, International Rights Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation, United States: "La vigilancia puede y amenaza los derechos humanos. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am by Marty Lederman
(The United States is not a State Party to the treaty, but most European nations are, including the UK, France, and Germany.) [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
Ten months on from the 13 May 2014 ruling of the Grand Chamber of the European Court in Case C131-12 Google Spain SL, Google Inc v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja Gonzalez, Google has received 234, 384 requests for removal of links and evaluated 850, 385 URLs. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:36 am by Lisa McElroy
”  Should we follow the rules at all costs, even if our allegiance to the rule of law results in grave injustice? [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This narrow interpretation of Section 109 was stretched to the breaking point by the Delaware Supreme Court’s en banc decision in  ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:27 am
The court stated that to interpret the Indenture to prohibit such Board approval of dissidents would have: "an eviscerating effect on the stockholder franchise [that] would raise grave concerns. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 10:03 am
  For example, long after Coke and Semayne were in their graves, the Saltpetre Men had the perfect right - indeed, a patriotic duty - to enter your lands and buildings at their discretion. [read post]