Search for: "State v. Irons"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 2,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2024, 10:15 am
Polansky v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 10:39 am
Azar v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:58 am
Ironically, one of the cases cited for “these standards” was Carrera v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm
The last delay of over a year is particularly ironic, since the parties had submitted a consent agreement in February of 2014. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Perhaps this next Supreme Court term, in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
Indeed, sometimes it seems that they view constitutionalism not just as a normative benchmark, but as the exclusivenormative standard in relation to a state’s institutional setup: for the authors, asking whether something “must be permitted” is the same question as asking whether “constitutionalism requires that they be permitted” (10). [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
It would also allow diplomats and Taiwanese military to display their flag and wear their uniforms while in the United States on official businesses. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 8:28 am
[Note: the court cites Facebook v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Commonwealth Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
Attorneys eligible are not limited to Plaintiffs’ National Liaison Counsel and members of Plaintiffs’ National Steering Committee, but include, for example, other attorneys called upon by them to assist in performing their responsibilities, State Liaison Counsel, and other attorneys performing similar responsibilities in state court actions in which the presiding state-court judge has imposed similar obligations upon plaintiffs to contribute to the fund.… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
" Other handguns, including historic models, had frames made from iron, brass, bronze, rather from steel. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
However, little is known about the Patent Clause because it was passed without debate or objection [ironically, given how often this Clause is now debated in IP and how cautious the Framers were in granting monopolies]. [read post]
