Search for: "Trade Secret Inc." Results 2321 - 2340 of 4,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2013, 2:15 pm by Woodrow Pollack
Plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction on the basis of trademark infringement and misappropriation of Plaintiffs' trade secrets. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:50 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer also regularly authors materials and conducts workshops and professional, management and other training on employee benefits, human resources, health care and other compliance and management topics for the ABA, Aspen Publishers, the Bureau of National Affairs (BNA), SHRM, World At Work, Insurance Thought Leadership, Government Institutes, Inc., Solutions Law Press, Inc., the Society of Professional Benefits Administrators, HealthLeaders, Managed Care Executive, CEO Magazine,… [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 4:17 am
After the jury found defendant A10 Networks ("A10") liable for misappropriation of trade secrets and infringement of patents owned by Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al ("Brocade"), the court entered two permanent injunctions against A10, one that prohibited additional patent infringement and another that applied to the misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:32 am by Florian Mueller
His article doesn't say that software copyright or trade secrets should be abolished as well. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:44 am
As demonstrated by the contentious trade secret litigation between E.I. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
P. 56(d), as well as its dismissal of Accent’s Missouri Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“MUTSA”) cause of action.Of the use of the word "a" or "an" -->See Baldwin Graphic Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1987) (patents issued during trade secret litigation regarding the same technology); see also Vanguard Research, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
  Accent’s trade secret misappropriation claim was based on the argument that the specifications and tolerances of its commercial device constituted trade secrets. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:08 am by David Jensen
As chief scientific officer, Love presumably would have had access to proprietary information and trade secrets contained in grant applications. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Stevo Design, Inc., v  SBR Marketing Ltd., 11-CV-00304 (D. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:02 pm by Ron Coleman
 But lookie here: A federal appeals court has ruled that Mattel Inc. doesn’t have to pay $172 million to MGA Entertainment Inc. to settle a trade secrets theft claim over Bratz dolls because a key claim should have been dismissed before trial. [read post]