Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 2321 - 2340
of 4,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 7:05 am
That trend has snowballed since 2013, when the Supreme Court struck down the core of the Defense of Marriage Act in the ACLU’s United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm
In a decision that spoke somewhat tentatively about an “evolving understanding of the meaning of equality,” the Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:25 am
In ONEOK v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
United States is, without a doubt, a “defense win. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
” That opinion, Bowers v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 3:00 pm
For example, in United States ex. rel Barko v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:18 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:47 am
” A few weeks ago, the IMF published its FSAP review of the United States, covering banking, insurance and securities. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
It did not do so, for example, in its most recent ruling in a major gay rights case — the 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The United States is party to 51, including the North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Code makes it a crime, among other things, tobring[] into the United States . . . or knowingly use[] any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) (! [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
Defendant cites no facts from anywhere in the United States outside New York City to establish that American citizens overwhelmingly chose air guns for "the core lawful purpose of self- Page 10 defense" (554 US at 630), rather than for sports and recreation. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Defendant cites no facts from anywhere in the United States outside New York City to establish that American citizens overwhelmingly chose air guns for "the core lawful purpose of self-defense" [915 N.Y.S.2d 811] (554 U.S. at 630, 128 S.Ct. 2783), rather than for sports and recreation. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
As Wikipedia explains, bankruptcy in the United Statesis a matter placed under federal jurisdiction by the United States Constitution (in Article 1,Section 8, Clause 4), which allows Congress to enact `uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States’. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
In Armstrong v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:38 am
I explored the question in my first published paper, Second Amendment Challenges to Student Housing Firearms Bans: The Strength of the Home Analogy.In that paper, I examine the United States Supreme Court decision, District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
Pa. 2012); Steele v. [read post]
