Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 2321 - 2340 of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:52 am by Gene Quinn
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am by Rodger Citron
In Kiobel, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissing a complaint filed under the ATS. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 2:36 am
Icaza, 492 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 2007), and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States, and McDonald v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am by Florian Mueller
No other cellular SEP holder comes to that negotiation making threats about cutting off its supply of products. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
§ 117(a)Choice of LawAppeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Sharpe, J.), dismissing plaintiffʹs claims for breach of contract, copyright infringement, misappropriation, and unfair competition arising from its sale of equipment and software for an automated assembly system. [read post]
Co-authored by Dara Offrede The first Over-the-Counter Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) ever cleared in the United Stated by the FDA was launched by Dexcom. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cal. 2008) (“[F]or an inven-tion conceived outside the United States, the date of conception for purposes of priority for a United States patent is the date the invention is first reported to the inventor’s agent within the United States. [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:44 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Court Explains Restitution Rulings, Settlement In Case Against Gambino Crime Family Members United States v. [read post]