Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 2341 - 2360 of 11,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 pm
In its opinion, the Anaheim panel vacated FERC's order, ruling that FPA § 206 does not authorize FERC to increase rates. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:55 am
LEXIS 1364 (July 27, 2010) holds blanket no-knock is unconstitutional: Indiana Code Section 35-33-5-7 does not constitute a blanket prohibition upon no-knock warrants in this State. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
In addition, the parties stipulated to the admission into evidence of Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 1 through 22, and Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 23 through 25 were admitted into evidence without objection. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
Therefore, the requirement is not jurisdictional and does not affect the filing date. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am by Nico Cordes
An alleged violation cannot be fundamental, in the sense of 'intolerable', if it does not cause an adverse effect. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am by Nico Cordes
An alleged violation cannot be fundamental, in the sense of 'intolerable', if it does not cause an adverse effect. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
  The issues are (1) whether the power of the Sea Fish Industry Authority to impose a levy under section 4 of the Fisheries Act 1981 extends to sea fish or sea fish products which are “landed” in a non-UK country and then imported into the UK; and (2) if the power does so extend to imported fish, whether the levy is contrary to articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as an impermissible charge having an effect equivalent to a… [read post]
25 May 2014, 2:10 am by Brad Hokanson
  Section 523(a)(1) states that bankruptcy does not discharge taxes if a required return was not filed or was filed or given after the date on which such return was due and after two years before the date of the filing of the petition. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
Recital 27 in the preamble to Directive 2001/29 does not preclude the existence of communication in a case like the present one, however. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
If a Board then does not give a party the opportunity to state its arguments, this can justify the objection that the right to be heard pursuant to A 113(1) had been violated. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 12:30 pm by Ron
10 Jan  2010 Bug - Word 2010 - CTRL-V of 1-cell table only copies text, not cell. [read post]