Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 2341 - 2360 of 4,619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am by MOTP
Under this exception, a record that is otherwise inadmissible as hearsay may be admissible if the proponent demonstrates that (1) the records were kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity; (2) it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the records; (3) the records were made at or near the time of the events recorded; and (4) the records were made by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Maria Grazia Porcedda
To preserve the effectiveness of Art 82(1), it is the controller who bears the burden of proving the appropriateness of TOMs in light of the security principle enshrined in Art 5(1)(f) and the rules of general application contained in Arts 24(1) and 32(1) at stake in actions for damages (paras 50-52). [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Claims 17 to 24 are claims to a computer system and claims 25 to 41 are claims to a “computer-readable medium”. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:08 am by Chris Castle
Of course, if you count home values into net worth as one does, there’s way more than a handful of taxpayers with a net worth over $1 million. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
But the Court, as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, does not have to follow that course. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According to a recent study, an estimated 93,094 illnesses are due to domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each year in the United… [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 11:18 am by Giles Peaker
Certainly the person must be a landlord of the property where the tenant lived; section 41(2)(a) requires that the offence relates to housing that, at the time of the offence, was let to the tenant. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Clients should provide my office with the following 1. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
In honor of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent grant of an appeal on the Restatement (Second)/Restatement (Third) in Tincher v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
(b) 5.30% 31 0.35% 5.65% 41 0.70% Vt. 6.00% 17 0.22% 6.22% 36 1.00% W.Va. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
BAPTISMS Certificate issued at time of baptism (See Note 1), £17. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 1:38 pm by Matthew D. Lee
This notice does not provide relief for the time period for filing a petition with the Tax Court, or for filing a claim or bringing a suit for credit or refund, if that period expired before April 1, 2020. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:54 am by Apostolos Anthimos
La Corte suprema slovena si confronta con i danni punitivi, Danno e responsabilità 1/2014, p. 18 et seq.). [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:55 am by Eric Goldman
The CPPA doubles down on the mandatory transparency requirement (but does it have any empirical justification?). [read post]