Search for: "First Holding Corporation"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 18,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2017, 7:27 am
” The post Chancery Excuses Pre-Suit Demand Requirement Due to Board’s Knowing Violation of Federal Regulation appeared first on Delaware Corporate & Commercial Litigation Blog. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:27 am
” The post Chancery Excuses Pre-Suit Demand Requirement Due to Board’s Knowing Violation of Federal Regulation appeared first on Delaware Corporate & Commercial Litigation Blog. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:51 pm
The post Chancery Dismisses Claims Challenging Merger; Applies BJR appeared first on Delaware Corporate & Commercial Litigation Blog. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 7:31 am
PepsiCo, Inc. et al Fireblok IP Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
The first view holds that entrenched managers implement antitakeover provisions in a value-destroying way to shield themselves from the market for corporate control (e.g., Bebchuk et al. 2008). [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
Exploring those debates in particular through the thinking of conservative Democrat Allen Thurman, it suggests that while white supremacy came under sustained attack during this era, settler-colonialism—the ideology and practice of replacing Native with settler populations—did not.Evelyn Atkinson, Slaves, Coolies, and Shareholders: Corporations Claim the Fourteenth AmendmentThis article examines the little-known case In re Tiburcio Parrott (1880), in which the federal court… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
The plaintiffs brought a class action against defendants, Medical Capital Holdings (MCH), Wells Fargo Bank and the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BNYM), for breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; securities fraud in violation of Chapter 517 of the Florida Securities and Investor Protection Act (FSIPA); and negligence. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:56 am
He argues that investing in the zero transition holds promises of returns that surpass imagination. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:52 pm
This decision marks the first time a court has applied Section 304 of the Act in the absence of allegations that the targeted CEO personally committed any wrongdoing, enforcing strict liability of CEOs and CFOs in the event of a restatement due to corporate (as opposed to their own) misconduct. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
Big Tech has a first mover crisis today – if anyone acts first, they’ll be punished for their dirty laundry. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
The post ACUS Update: Four New Recommendations Adopted & ACUS-LSC Hold Third Public Forum on Assisting Parties in Administrative Adjudication appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:46 am
Our first Say on Pay and Proxy Results report of the 2020 proxy season included four predictions for voting trends. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:54 pm
A benefit enforcement proceeding is instead a mechanism for traditional parties to hold directors and officers accountable with respect to the general and/or specific public purposes of the benefit corporation. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:16 am
Take the first step towards safeguarding your investment and your future. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
The post Securities Plaintiffs Beware: Third Circuit Holds Initiating Suit to Force Settlement May Violate Rule 11 and Can Lead to Mandatory Sanctions Under the PSLRA appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
The post Securities Plaintiffs Beware: Third Circuit Holds Initiating Suit to Force Settlement May Violate Rule 11 and Can Lead to Mandatory Sanctions Under the PSLRA appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
The post Securities Plaintiffs Beware: Third Circuit Holds Initiating Suit to Force Settlement May Violate Rule 11 and Can Lead to Mandatory Sanctions Under the PSLRA appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
Thus, plaintiff was not entitled to discovery before first establishing his right to sue derivatively. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
She is the first woman to hold the Court’s highest seat in its over 200 year history. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:40 am
Because tribal corporation don't have to pay Federal Unemployment Tax on its employees, which is around six percent of the first slice of an employee's wages. [read post]
