Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2007, 3:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:39 am
United States, 930 F.2d 867, 869 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm
The Wilderness Society; Prairie Falcon Audubon, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
§§ 1395i-3, 1396r Propriety of Federal Court's Abstention, Under Younger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:21 am
Earlier today, in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:04 am
United States, issued by the Supreme Court on May 7. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:08 pm
State Farm Lloyds, 202 S.W.3d 744, 746 (Tex. 2006). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:56 am
As, John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court observed, a jury has "a right to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:20 am
Here's a case in which the tax fraud committed by the husband and wife landed in the United States Supreme Court and wound up in their deportation. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 1:09 pm
United States, 556 F.3d 1244, 1253 (11th Cir.2009). [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
Finally, the pivot from tallying states to enshrining the APA’s view as the law of the land solves very little. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:28 am
Tuesday’s oral argument in Tarrant Water District v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
That agency is the Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:22 pm
., ACLU v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:19 am
United States, 566 U.S. ___ (2009). [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Giraldo v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
” Examining the claim for a violation of substantive due process the court addressed the application of 42 USC 1983 in the context of land use disputes: “"In the land use context, 42 USC § 1983 protects against municipal actions that violate a property owner's rights to due process, equal protection of the laws and just compensation for the taking of property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States… [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
” Examining the claim for a violation of substantive due process the court addressed the application of 42 USC 1983 in the context of land use disputes: “"In the land use context, 42 USC § 1983 protects against municipal actions that violate a property owner's rights to due process, equal protection of the laws and just compensation for the taking of property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States… [read post]
