Search for: "M & B, Inc." Results 2341 - 2360 of 4,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The plaintiff now moves the Court to reconsider its Order and Reasons, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b).I. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The plaintiff now moves the Court to reconsider its Order and Reasons, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b).I. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:17 am by JR Chaves
El caso arranca del art.96. 2 del Estatuto Básico del Empleado Público (EBEP) que dispone que “2. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:08 pm
Além disso, toda a movimentação referente ao mês de novembro de 2004 foi ocultada, como também não foram apresentados livros auxiliares autenticados com registros das operações, ratificando o descumprimento legal. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by News Desk
Presented to an individual for outstanding service to the public, IAFP and the arena of education in food safety and food protection.Sponsored by: Nelson-Jameson, Inc.2020 Recipient: Lynn M. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 1:28 pm by Carl Trudeau
Cette conclusion s’appuie sur le fait que l’employeur offre déjà deux (2) journées d’absence rémunérées aux employés comptant trois (3) mois de service continu, peu importe la raison d’absence et sans même qu’il soit nécessaire de justifier l’absence (ce qui est même plus généreux que la LNT alors que celle-ci limite le droit aux absences… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:10 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Cuánto podría durar el proceso de discusión y aprobación es una incógnita, mas según Báez Rivera, es posible que se termine antes de que culmine el 2015. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by David Cheifetz
I’m reminded of something I’m sure was told us back when I articled, long ago in the last millennium. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:43 am by Jonathan H. Adler
An example would be mistaking the relevant subsection in a statutory cross-reference – say mistaking “(i)” for “(ii)” or “Section 36B(B)(I)(b)” for “Section 36(B)(I)(b),” or screwing up punctuation. [read post]