Search for: "MARK D. LINK"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 4,293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2013, 3:02 am
D. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 4:45 pm
The detailed information is set out in the table available at this link.[6] There is a great deal of variation in the intellectual property curricula and programs of law schools offered to law students. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:21 am
Christensen & Eric D. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:07 am
Clear Choice Holdings LLC, Appeal No. 14-1071 (Opposition No. 91190485) [The Board sustained this Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark REAL CHOICE, finding confusion likely with the registered mark CLEARCHOICE DENTAL IMPLANTS, both for dental implant services [DENTAL IMPLANTS disclaimed in the registered mark]. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
They are summarized below, with links to the pertinent TTABvue pages where the decisions may be found, as well as to the pertinent TTABlog postings, if any. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:40 am
To qualify as a protectable mark, a slogan like “Show Your Joe” or “Show You’re Jockey” would need to acquire a secondary meaning, or, enough recognition that when rattled-off, the brand linked to the slogan immediately comes to mind. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:20 pm
We’re here today to discuss a critical topic at a critical time, and I’d like to thank everyone at NYU Law and the Center on Law and Security, especially Sam Rascoff and Zach Goldman, for inviting me to be part of this conference. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 12:29 pm
Any chance you’d publish it if you think it speaks to your audience? [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm
Updated the web links throughout the Code and Annexes. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 10:51 am
Because defendants had been authorized to use plaintiffs’ trademark, the court held, there could be no bad faith intent to profit from the mark. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
That proposal appeared in the Federal Register on November 13, 2013 (pages 67985–67999), and here are links to it onlineand exactly as it appearsin the hard copy of the Federal Register. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:59 pm
Decision 37 COM 7A.26 declared, in part, that the WHC "[d]eplores the continued Israeli failure to cooperate and facilitate the implementation of the ... [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
(the link is to the decision that is being appealed). [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Court, D. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
D-Link Systems, Inc. et al. 2006 FC 1484, Justice von Finckenstein wrote: [7] If we analyse paragraph 13 it becomes apparent that the Plaintiff alleges two things: a) that the Defendants callously, knowingly and wilfully infringed their patent, and b) that they failed to negotiate with the Plaintiff or seek a licence. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Now, speaking of founding fathers, I need an excuse such as Blawg Review to link to The TTABlog® – because without one, I’d be linking there even more than I do now. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
Link To Your Sources (Forbes Cross-Post) http://ow.ly/2B9v4M The Very First Time Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg Publicly Uttered The Word ‘Privacy’ http://ow.ly/2B9ArL UK: North East Lincolnshire Council hit with £80,000 penalty after breach involving special needs children’s… http://ow.ly/2B9hq8 Ediscovery and DataProtection Daily is out! [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:31 am
McSweet LLC, Opposition No. 91178758 [Section 2(d) and 43(c) opposition to registration of MCSWEET for pickled vegetable products, in view of Opposer's alleged "Mc-formative" family of marks]. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
The last hurrah of the ancien regime was not so much the failed prosecution of Penguin Books Limited in 1960 for publishing D H Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover but rather the famous – or infamous &ndas [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
Henry D. [read post]
