Search for: "People v. Bounds"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
” “If [a defendant] wants the United States to be bound by a decision dismissing the indictment, he should be similarly willing to bear the consequences of a decision upholding it. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:04 am
It would fly in the face of constitutional text and history, when conservative judges purport to be bound by these sources. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:59 pm
The state cited Schlegel v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:02 pm
In a tone that I suspect he had perfected solely to freeze the blood of unwary clerks, he said, “If the public wishes an official version, they may refer to the bound edition. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
On March 25, 2022, the Maryland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Park Plus v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 7:56 am
In the recent case of Clyde & Co LLP v Bates Van Winkelhof [2012[ EWCA Civ 1207 it was subsection (b) of the above definition that was under discussion. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
“The decision to pardon Nixon was a political judgment properly within the bounds of Ford's constitutional authority,” he argued. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 6:46 am
In the low hills of Texas people talked straight. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 pm
Pursuant to People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:28 am
There is, of course, a far more recent precedent for the idea that the judiciary is entitled to review executive determinations regarding the existence or non-existence of armed conflict: Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:10 am
Obviously, each reader will draw the line in a different place: Stevenson will be on solid ground for some and may be far out of bounds for others. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:40 am
Plus, arbitrators aren’t bound by decisions made by other courts or even other arbitrators. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:08 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:15 pm
Here is an excerpt: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:22 am
And, now, in Roberts v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
United States of America v James J. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:38 am
Based on what I come across in the general political debate, it seems like many people assume that this is the most effective approach to dealing with the economic harm caused by subsidies. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:47 pm
Here’s a link to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals August 6, 2019, decision (Texas v EEOC). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:52 am
Judge Wood also relied in part upon a wide interpretation of the Supreme Court’s 1967 ruling in Loving v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:47 pm
Here’s a link to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals August 6, 2019, decision (Texas v EEOC). [read post]
