Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2008, 11:36 am
In this case, Straights and Gays for Equality v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Essex County, Docket No. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:03 am
Now the Supreme Court has held, in Kleindienst v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the case of R v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
Superior Court (1983) 33 Cal.3d 419, 441.) [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:37 am
Ash v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:14 pm
I have discussed the reform with members of Congress and it has been debated in prior years.2004... 2002... this is post-Bush v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
Here's Ramsey: I was initially skeptical of the major questions doctrine (MQD), as deployed by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:34 am
She also spoke to superiors at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs while in France a month later, who then contacted the director’s superior. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, the Nokia v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Catlin,(Cal. 2001); People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm
The Supreme Court in Cloutier v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
(The law and ruling are explained in detail here.)In the Indiana case, the Court cited a precedent from 1983, Akron v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
Superior Court of California. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In Riegel, the violation claims were dismissed on non-preemption grounds, and aren't before the Court. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Historically, courts have been cautious about encroaching on sacred terrain when interpreting family law; however, the Supreme Court of Canada in Marcovitz v Bruker, (2007 SCC 54), settled this contention. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
A Superior Court judge denied the defendant's motion to suppress the recording as the fruit of an unconstitutional search, and the defendant appealed. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
