Search for: "Reiter v Reiter"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 6,282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2011, 2:28 pm
Public Storage, Faulkinbury v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:54 pm
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the issues presented either lack… [read post]
KY: Pulling down handcuffed defendant's pants to search for crack felt in a patdown was unreasonable
13 Nov 2008, 6:31 pm
Bell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
Santobello v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) Earlier this morning, the Supreme Court chose to hear Fisher v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
Resource: Wetzel v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:13 am
Earlier this week, a panel of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Arizona v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:00 am
Servs. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Babasa v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:14 am
Fresh from a security scrub are these two items in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2006, 1:52 am
In Howard v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:40 am
Due process in administrative hearings requirementsGoohya v Walsh-Tozer, App. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
As for the defendant's objection to the use of acquitted conduct to enhance his sentence, the Court reiterated its holding in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
The Court, however, reiterated that Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:06 pm
” Leocal v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:01 pm
In Shapiro v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Youtsey v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:57 am
” Finally, the court distinguished its decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:23 pm
Similarly, in Kita v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
” In its brief on the merits, the United States starts by reiterating that, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
