Search for: "Spells v. Spells"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc.).In delivering its new judgment in the long-running (15+ years and counting!) [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 6:34 am
SEMINAL C ASE LAW ON EMPLOYMENT: BORELLO, MARTINEZ, DYNAMEX § 30 Overview § 31 Borello Case § 32 Martinez Case § 33 Dynamex Case §§ 34-39 Reserved PART V. [read post]
23 Nov 2024, 7:25 am
[Merpel: by contrast, in the UK case involving Rihanna, the courts did not take the view that all pop stars would necessarily have a reputation or goodwill associated with clothing].Whereas the primary judge took the view that "Katie" is more conservative than "Katy", such that consumers would notice the "striking" difference in spelling and not be confused, the Court held that the ordinary consumer would have an imperfect recollection of the "Katy… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:56 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 9:34 am
Other times, this intended impact is explicitly spelled out in the text of the policies and bills. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:59 am
If we take the case of the UK, very recently the Court of Appeal of England and Wales revisited the issue of joint authorship in Kogan v Martin, adopting a somewhat different approach from the one envisaged at first instance [Katpost here]. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
Because of my pro-copyright positions in connection with Oracle v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm
And in a 2000 decision, in Kimel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:50 am
Calibra Pictures, LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
Todd Dickinson’s comments at Bio Conference (IAM) The Charles Rivers Ventures connection – CRV stakes in RPX Corp, Thinkfire and Intellectual Ventures (IAM) Obama Administration tackling patent backlog (IP Watchdog) Patent examiners told to issue patents (IP Watchdog) More funding needed for patent granting authority (IP Watchdog) Short note on patentability of product-by-process claims – Newman J’s opinion in 1985 case In re Thorpe: Abbott v Sandoz… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
” In Cotten v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 7:12 pm
For the individual, the foremost reason why not is spelled out in Chapter 3 of IRS Publication 519, US Tax Guide for Aliens. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:29 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Janus, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
Karlseng v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am
by Dennis Crouch In the trademark case of Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:24 am
Seng-Tiong Ho v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm
., v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 10:06 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
