Search for: "State v. Hazard" Results 2341 - 2360 of 3,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a very brief summary: In a long line of cases (such as Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:27 am
 However, in the case of Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan and Hollywood Heritage v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:44 pm by John Jascob
Burr’s stock sales in mid-February 2020 ran afoul of Exchange Act Sections 10(b) and 20A and Rule 10b-5 as well as the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act of 2012 (Jacobson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:47 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> El Paso Natural Gas Company v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 9:54 am by Eric Segall
This limitation is constitutionally mandated, separating our branch from our political co-branches. '[F]ederal judges—who have no constituency—have a duty to respect legitimate policy choices made by those who do.' [quoting Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The state of California’s lawyer, Washington attorney Carter G. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm by Thomas James
It is hazardous to read too much into the ruling in this case. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]