Search for: "State v. True" Results 2341 - 2360 of 21,794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am by Guest Blogger
Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnellWe appreciate the lively discussion of Justice Chase’s opinion in Calder v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am by Paul M. Rashkind
He pointed out that he hasn’t canvassed all the cases so didn’t know if that was true and that he was not prepared to say that it should be true. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 9:13 am by Eric Segall
Pittenger and Wolman v Walters.These two cases held that the only educational equipment and materials that states could provide to children in religious schools were secular textbooks. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 248 U.S. 78, 39 S.Ct.40, 63 L.Ed. 138 (1918) and Metlakatla Indian Community v. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 10:37 am by Eric Goldman
Liberally construing Leary’s pro se pleadings and assuming all well-pleaded facts are true, his two misrepresentation claims under § 512(f) contain sufficient factual matter to state plausible claims for relief. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by New York Criminal Defense
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by Donald Thompson
 In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:30 am by Frances Zacher
Here in the United States, Samsung is also running into IP trouble with its Galaxy tab. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:55 am
The issue in Qayyum Ansari v New India Assurance Limited [2008] EWHC 243 was whether, when a sprinkler system had been turned off prior to a fire, there had been a material change in cover in the facts stated in a proposal form so as to bring into effect a termination of cover. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]