Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 2341 - 2360 of 10,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 11:09 am by Guest Author
Superior Court (S222732), in which it established a new and more streamlined legal test to determine whether a worker should be classified as an independent contractor or employee. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:41 am by Jeffrey D. Polsky
Superior Court, in which the California Supreme Court said that employers (and even a state agency that protects workers) were using the wrong standard to distinguish employees and independent contractors under the state’s Wage Orders. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:02 pm by Gordon Firemark
Superior Court, and clarified the standard for determining whether workers should be classified as employees or independent contractors. [read post]
4 May 2018, 11:58 pm by Anthony Zaller
  The California Supreme Court recognized this in Dynamex, stating: As the United States Supreme Court observed in Board v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 8:36 pm by Ginzburg & Bronshteyn LLP
Judges from the Los Angeles Superior Court (Probate Division) expected in attendance were: Hon. [read post]
For nearly 30 years prior to this decision, California courts had used a multi-factor analysis, first described by the California Supreme Court in S. [read post]
2 May 2018, 5:52 pm by Arkady Itkin
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc., v Superior Court, making it even harder for companies to classify workers as independent contractors (rather than employees). [read post]
2 May 2018, 5:52 pm by Arkady Itkin
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc., v Superior Court, making it even harder for companies to classify workers as independent contractors (rather than employees). [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:53 pm by Miles Dolinger
Superior Court, (2018) 4 Cal.5th 241,  the California Supreme Court held that homeowners’ (collectively “the Van Tassels”) claims seeking recovery for construction defect damages are subject to the Right to Repair Act (“RRA” or “The Act”, California Civil Code section 895 et seq.), and thus the Van Tassels were required to comply with prelitigation procedures under the Act even if their operative complaint… [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:57 pm by Michael Mau
Superior Court, clarifying the standard for determining whether workers in California should be classified as employees or as independent contractors for purposes of the wage orders adopted by California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (“IWC”). [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:15 am by Cyrus Farivar
Superior Court of Los Angeles County could have a profound impact on many tech companies like Uber, Lyft, Instacart, and others that provide on-demand services. [read post]