Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE" Results 2341 - 2360 of 5,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2008, 10:52 pm
Town of Henrietta - how to prove a substantive due process case Franco v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
An officer or employee must possesses the appropriate license or permit only if he or she is performing duties that require such a license or permit Ricket v Mahan, 2012 NY Slip Op 05773, Appellate Division, Third Department One of the issues considered by the Appellate Division in this appeal was the allegation that the Town of Colonie appointed an individual to the office of Commissioner of Public Works who was unqualified for the position. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:09 am by Tessa Shepperson
Way of life v conservations Then there is the role of the National Trust as a conservation body. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:36 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Acknowledging that generally, traversing stairs is a neutral risk and injuries resulting therefrom are not compensable under the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act, but construing the state’s rules on traveling employees, an Illinois appellate court affirmed a finding of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission that a town’s “blight inspector” was a traveling employee and accordingly, that injuries sustained by him in a fall… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Town of Eaton, 144 N.E. 667 (N.Y. 1924)]); Lagua v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
Jurisdiction to resolve an impasse in collective bargaining under the Taylor LawPolice Benevolent Association v City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 52 In a unanimous ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] has exclusive jurisdiction insofar as resolving Taylor Law impasse situations are concerned. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
In reaching this conclusion, the trial court relied on what it characterized as the "procedures" mandated by the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
"Abortion, death penalty wins slow in coming on state-by-state basis," is Mark Pattison's report via Baltimore's Catholic Review.If Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:39 am
Last week, the Second Circuit upheld the NLRB decision in NLRB v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Jianlin Chen, Deconstructing the Religious Free Market, (3 Journal of Law, Religion and State 1-24 (2014)).Russell G. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Roberts, An Alternative Theory of Burwell v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and; Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, the so-called Pell Doctrine, the court said that the penalty imposed, suspension without pay for one year, did not shock the judicial conscience.______________________ A Reasonable Penalty Under The Circumstances - a 618-page volume focusing on New York State court and administrative decisions addressing an appropriate disciplinary penalty to be imposed on an employee in the public service found… [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
The Smiths and Judge Moore were certainly trailblazers, paving the way for legal precedent supporting the LGBTQ+ community for years to follow.The full text of the decision can be found here: Smith v Avanti. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Brownstein, Constitutional Myopia: The Supreme Court's Blindness to Religious Liberty and Religious Equality Values in Town of Greece v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
., Local 1170 v Town of Greece, 85 AD3d 1668, leave to appeal denied 18 NY3d 802, the Appellate Division noted that an arbitrator is required to interpret and apply the terms of a CBA and while another entity could have applied a different construction to the relevant provision of the agreement, in this instance “it cannot be stated that the arbitrator gave a completely irrational construction to the provision in dispute and, in effect, exceeded [his]… [read post]