Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 7,223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2018, 8:29 am
Iancu, which held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) arm of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) must issue a final written decision addressing each and every patent claim challenged in an Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) petition if review is granted. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:02 pm
Patent No. 10,000,000, the USPTO is taking full advantage of the opportunity educate the public about the history and importance of patents to the United States, and to generate excitement about the U.S. patent system in general. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
Burns will moderate a discussion with Gerard Araud, the ambassador of France to the United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:33 am
Dean Earns 2017 Leadership In Action Award from the Partnership for Public Service and the Leadership Alumni Board for Spearheading USPTO's Office of the Ombudsman Alexander SofocleousIn May of 2016, the United States Patent & Trademark Office launched a pilot program for the USPTO’s Office of the Ombudsman. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Yesterday the United States Patent and Trademark Office had bad news for a particularly broad member of Twitter's key patent family, U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 12:16 pm
United States, 205 F.3d 1369, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:24 am
Yesterday I wrote about the United States Patent and Trademark Office filing a Director’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Remand in In re Intelligent Medical Objects, Inc., which was filed on June 5, 2018. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:24 am
Yesterday I wrote about the United States Patent and Trademark Office filing a Director’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Remand in In re Intelligent Medical Objects, Inc., which was filed on June 5, 2018. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 12:33 pm
Yesterday the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) filed a Director's Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Remand in In re Intelligent Medical Objects, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 12:33 pm
Yesterday the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) filed a Director's Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Remand in In re Intelligent Medical Objects, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:58 am
In furtherance of that process, the Buffalo Bills recently filed a trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, seeking to register “Respect the Process. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:20 am
Institute of Peace The United States Institute of Peace has been charged by Congress with developing a “comprehensive plan to prevent the underlying causes of extremism in fragile states in the Sahel, Horn of Africa, and Near East. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 9:46 am
Immediately on the heels of the International Trademark Association’s 140th Annual Meeting in Seattle, and our well-received panel discussion concerning Trademarks and Free Speech, the United States Patent and Trademark Office announced it will continue to hold on to and suspend trademark applications containing scandalous or immoral matter, until further notice. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:00 am
Institute of Peace The United States Institute of Peace has been charged by Congress with developing a “comprehensive plan to prevent the underlying causes of extremism in fragile states in the Sahel, Horn of Africa, and Near East. [read post]
26 May 2018, 1:17 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the federal courts now consider diagnostic tests to be ineligible for patent as an abstract idea. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases in which patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2018, 12:42 pm
United States Patent Nos. 7,912,786 (“the ‘786 patent”), 8,131,643 (“the ‘643 patent”), 8,321,347 (“the ‘643 patent”), and 8,620,809 (“the ‘809 patent”). [read post]
23 May 2018, 2:44 pm
For example, the ITC does not stay proceedings pending inter partes review (“IPR”) of the validity of an asserted patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office whereas district courts often stay cases while IPRs are pending. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:37 am
(“Praxair”) appeals from theinter partes review decision of the United States Patentand Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board(“the Board”) holding claim 9 of U.S. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:35 pm
Currently, the standard for claim construction is different in AIA reviews before the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“USPTO”) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB) than in proceedings in federal district courts and the International Trade Commission (“ITC”). [read post]
