Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
TrademarkUse of the Term/Mark “Engineer”State Regulation of the TermFirst Amendment’s Commercial SpeechDisclaimerAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.E. raises only its constitutional claim on appeal. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:03 am
May 2, 2012): After the September 11, 2011 attacks on the United States, the government detained Jose Padilla, an American citizen, as an enemy combatant. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
For a United States owner applying in the USA, however, the registration will be limited to the actual items with which the mark is used. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
The case in question was Evenwel v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:53 am
After a preliminary injunction hearing, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas has determined that D&O insurers for the Stanford Financial Group and various related entities are no longer required to advance defense costs relating to criminal charges and civil litigation filed against Mark Kuhrt, Gilbert Lopez and R. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
Furthermore, from the defendant's perspective, adversarial proceedings certainly have been initiated once he has been informed of charges and had his liberty restricted, regardless of whether the prosecutor is involved Next, Justice Souter addressed the County's reliance on United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:01 am
") (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted), with United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
Silvas v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
There is something inherently unrealistic in saying that A "uses" his mark in the United Kingdom when all that he does is to place the mark on the internet, from a location outside the United Kingdom, and simply wait in the hope that someone from the United Kingdom will download it and thereby create use on the part of A". [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:52 pm
" United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 5:50 am
SEC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
In Hamdan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
On Monday the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 12:02 pm
Within a few days of each other, the Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had Apple v. [read post]
