Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 2361 - 2380 of 8,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm by Jamie Markham
We know that judges already use the substantial assistance law at least about 20 percent of the time for drug traffickers, because over 75 of the 422 trafficking defendants sentenced last year got probation. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 10:02 am by Giles Peaker
CPR Part 55.2(1) is in mandatory terms. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 2:14 pm by Frank Heft
§841(b)(1)(A)(ii)) and on the crack conviction it was 0 to 20 years (21 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:40 am by Kristian Soltes
Cade said preliminary information provided by both Cielo and Facebook indicated their agreement does not limit new deals with rivals and does not reduce consumers’ choice. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:32 am by CMS
If section 160A does so require, does a failure to give that other such an opportunity render the confiscation order invalid? [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 pm
” The caption identifies State Farm and Does 1 to 20 as defendants . . . .State Farm filed a general and special demurrer on the grounds that Eghtesad failed to plead sufficient facts to state causes of action for fraud, defamation, and breach of contract, and that each of the claims was uncertain. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:43 am by Michael Lowe
If the violation results in serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of this title), such person shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and if the violation results in death, such person shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Both Scott and the Krinsky defendants interfered in his relationship with the newly hired attorney and as a result of their interference, attorney Michael Gentile withdrew from representing him (Savitt 7/31/19 affidavit at ¶¶ 49-54 and 9/30/19 affidavit at ¶ 40 [Doc No. 20]). [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The SEC’s Right to Seek Disgorgement In an 8-1 decision written by Justice Sotomayor, the Supreme Court held “that a disgorgement award that does not exceed a wrongdoer’s net profits and is awarded for victims is equitable relief permissible” under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 1:48 pm by Andrew Appel
Venetis on August 21 that they’re planning to use some sort of on-line voting system that does not satisfy the criteria enumerated above, then she will seek a court order to prevent any internet-based system from being used. [read post]