Search for: "Does 1 - 47" Results 2361 - 2380 of 4,452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a 47-page published decision filed June 17, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition, and held that Respondent Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (“Agency”) must comply with CEQA before “refining” its Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (“MSHCP”) to exclude a 200-acre parcel of ranch land owned by Anheuser-Busch, LLC (“Busch”) from its… [read post]
Magenheimer that the Indiana Tort Claims Act (“ITCA”) does not govern a claim under Indiana Code chapter 35-47-11.1, which prohibits political subdivisions from regulating firearms (“Indiana Firearms Preemption Act” or “IFP Act”). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
On remand, a Fifth Circuit panel ruled, 2-1, that UT Austin presented sufficient evidence to prove that its admissions program is narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling state interest of the educational benefits of diversity. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm
Code Sec. 61(a)(1) defines gross income as "all income from whatever source derived. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am by Patricia Salkin
So long as the requirement does not constitute a physical taking or deprive the owner of all viable economic use, it does not violate the takings clause. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
Code § 16(a)(1)(B) (authorizing immediate appeal of order denying motion to compel arbitration). [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Not the only regional ogre: does EPO have a soul-mate in OAPI? [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Howard Knopf
It does not refer to any events since 2010 and doesn’t seem to include any longer any of the studies it has sponsored on its own in recent times, such as this one that I commented on in 2007. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
§ 227(b)(1)(A)(iii), alleging that the defendant instructed or allowed a third party to send unsolicited text messages to him and others. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
DOE calculated the respective reconciliation rates as $49 and $47 per service unit, the key reason for the difference in rates being that DOE used total service units reported by the municipalities. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOE calculated the respective reconciliation rates as $49 and $47 per service unit, the key reason for the difference in rates being that DOE used total service units reported by the municipalities. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  The Ministry of Justice does now publish statistics on privacy injunctions which now form part of the Civil Justice Statistics Quarterly and are published every 6 months. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
  It does not include lost opportunities, disincentives to innovation, the inability to raise money due to the decrease in collateral, and the loss of jobs without those investments. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:41 am by INFORRM
Nor did Google seek to dispute that the damage or distress suffered by Mr Mosley was ‘unwarranted’ for the purposes of s. 10(1). [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 8:00 am by Legal Beagle
I therefore acquitted him on Monday.When a judge does that, the Advocate Depute the right to ask for 2 days to consider whether to take an appeal against the decision to the appeal court. [read post]