Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 5,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
More specifically, the Lanham Act prohibits registration of marks that are generic descriptions of goods, that are specific descriptions of characteristics of goods, that are surnames (even of the source), and that indicate the geographic origin of a good. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:24 pm
C’mon. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:24 pm
C’mon. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 339 (1986) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
These appeals will consider whether a criminal offence can be committed under the Trade Marks Act 1994, s 92(1)(b) or (c) (selling, offering for sale or distribution/possession with a view) where the proprietor of the registered trade mark has given its consent to the application of the sign which is its registered trade mark or has itself applied its own registered trade mark to the goods, but has not given its consent to the sale, distribution… [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
(Answers: B, C, E, F and G are allowed or registered marks. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
Josh Gerstein reports on Carpenter for Politico, noting that “[l]ower courts have generally ruled that a warrant is not required for such data because it is voluntarily shared by users with third parties, namely the telephone companies,” but “[c]ritics say the precedents behind those decisions are outdated in light of the realities of life in the digital age. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:43 am
But suit has now been filed by Mark Begnaud, adding a very different dimension to an already unconstitutional situation. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These recommendations and challenges suggest that issues of corporate personality, of sovereign immunity, of asset partition, and of the mania for compartmentalization that marks certain approaches to global economic and financial regulation may well hobble the work of embedding human rights within the operation of states as owners and SOEs as public enterprises. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
This is the final part of a five-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:47 am
Com. 11 January 2017, No 15-15750, Bull: Monsieur X c. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
ODN Posted by Gail Weinstein & Robert C. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Send us postcards at Ruth and Rob, c/o Venjuris P.C., 1938 E. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Send us postcards at Ruth and Rob, c/o Venjuris P.C., 1938 E. [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:58 am
" Judge Newman pointed to the TTAB's non-precedential opinion in In re Licores Veracruz, S.A. de C. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:00 am
It shows that: (1) law societies are the “lynch pin” of the justice system—when they fail, it fails; and that, (2) law societies’ major problems: (a) will be national; (b) require national solutions; and, (c) will be problems for which lawyers and law societies lack the necessary expertise. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
And the court must assume arguendo that Section 2(c) of E.O. violates Establishment clause of the Constitution (Cooksey v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:46 pm
What We Can Learn from the Rana Plaza Factory Building Collapse Larry Catá Backer*Abstract: In 2013, over a thousand workers were killed when the Rana Plaza factory building collapsed in Bangladesh, one housing several garment factories producing goods for global consumer markets. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:20 am
The issuance of the writ did not definitively resolve the dispute between the parties, but it did mark the end of the writ proceeding in the trial court. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:44 pm
DuPont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1362(C.C.P.A. 1973).Judge Newman mentioned In re Licores Veracruz, S.A. de C. [read post]
