Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 2361 - 2380 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2016, 8:29 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Bank Melli v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 2:16 am
 The Court also notes that the Member States may lay down additional conditions capable of improving the protection of authors’ rights beyond what is expressly laid down in the directive. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Giles Peaker
Its deficiencies were acknowledged in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Burnip v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2013] PTSR 117, para 46. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
O’Connor 1995 CanLII 51, [1995] 4 SCR 411, at paras. 24, and, 168-187; R. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
Nor did Janowiec v Russia (2013) App nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09 assist the claimant. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 6:36 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Last summer, the California Labor Commission ruled in Uber v Berwick that Uber workers in that state were employees, not contractors, based on the broad basis of control exerted by the company. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:23 am by INFORRM
In other words, Article 7(f) does contain an exhaustive (and limitative) list of legal bases, which cannot be shrunk by Member States [para. 57]. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Jenny Gesley
Commenting on this situation, the EU Commissioner for Justice, Consumers, and Gender Equality, Věra Jourová, stated that the EU should look into ways to expand its legal options to enforce consumer interests. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm by David Cheifetz
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Johnson, 2002 WI App 166, 7, 256 Wis.2d 871, 649 N.W.2d 284 (Wisconsin Court of Appeals 2002) (citing State v. [read post]