Search for: "People v. Roberts"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 6,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 6:06 pm
To paraphrase Chief Justice John Roberts, when you put 10,000 mostly drunk people in the middle of nowhere, 8 cops are just not enough to keep the peace.We here at the Law Blogger would add: the object of the event is to determine who can ski the fastest being pulled behind a snowmobile. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:37 am
Could it have to do with overturning Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:51 am
” A second challenge to the program, Dept. of Education v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:59 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:24 am
In that memo, he says that Brown v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:25 am
Filburn (1942) and Gonzales v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Senate v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
Baird], and Carey [v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
They sued claiming the companies’ advertising was deceptive, and sought certification of a nationwide class of about 30,000 people. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:29 am
In Ziglar v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:00 am
In Estate of Novosett v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 7:21 am
On Monday I attended the oral argument before the Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:47 am
The video of oral argument before the 9th Circuit in Baca v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:11 pm
”Chief Justice John Roberts first raised the issue when he asked whether the administration considered anything “special about the fact that the people involved in this case are part of a religious organization. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:33 am
” Robert Thomas Woods passed a civil service examination and his name was placed on a list of eligibles to be appointed as a New York City firefighter. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:17 pm
Chief Justice Roberts in Holder v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:40 am
People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
This forever changed people’s expectations of the value of an image. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
See Hicks v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Perry and Randall v. [read post]
