Search for: "Robert Thomas"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 10,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2020, 6:03 am
This comes from the case syllabus:KAGAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
It was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:15 am
It was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
So too Thomas Edison. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:08 pm
If so, the majority opinion in Baca would have consisted of only five members: Roberts, Ginsburg, Alito, Kagan, and Kavanaguh. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
Baude cited Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in last term’s Gamble v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:24 am
Washington, historian Caroline Weber, historian Randi Weingarten, American Federation of Teachers Bari Weiss Sean Wilentz, Princeton University Garry Wills Thomas Chatterton Williams, writer Robert F. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh announced the judgment of the court and issued a plurality opinion that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito joined fully and Justice Clarence Thomas joined with respect to the First Amendment analysis but not the remedy. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
— Justice Kavanaugh's plurality opinion was joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Alito, and Justice Thomas. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Robert D. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:39 pm
“[W]e expressed serious doubts about the Act’s continued constitutionality,” Roberts wrote of Northwest Austin; “[e]ight Members of the Court subscribed to these views, and the remaining Member [Justice Thomas] would have held the Act unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:18 pm
The majority opinion, authored by Justice Kavanaugh and joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Alito, and Justice Thomas, found the government’s arguments that the Exception was not content-based unpersuasive, but, instead, relied upon the Exception’s text, drawing a distinction based on the message a speaker is permitted to convey: “A robocall that says, ‘Please pay your government debt’ is legal. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Se le unieron el juez presidente, John Roberts, el juez Samuel Alito y el juez Clarence Thomas en las partes I y II de la opinión. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 11:27 am
The Justices split on the constitutionality of the exemption: Justice Kavanaugh, with whom Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, or Gorsuch, agreed on this point, concluded that the exception was content-based and thus unconstitutional unless it passed "strict scrutiny"—i.e., unless it was narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest, a standard that this exception couldn't meet. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:43 am
Two other would-be faithless electors in Colorado, Polly Baca and Robert Nemanich, eventually cast their ballots for Clinton. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:30 am
El juez Clarence Thomas suscribió un opinión concurrente a la que se unió el juez Gorsuch. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
Gorsuch and Thomas found that the severability of the statute is not permissible. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 7:02 am
Roberts, Jr. and Justice Samuel A. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
Justice Clarence Thomas in concurrence also relied on the First Congress—or to be more precise, he relied on Chief Justice William Howard Taft’s interpretation of it in Myers. [read post]
