Search for: "Shields v. State"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 4,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2024, 6:47 am
Whistleblower DQ of Assistant US Attorney Denied: “United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Ever since the FDA decided that discretion was the better part of valor – or read the handwriting on the wall – and decided not to appeal United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 12:15 pm
Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(v). [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:12 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:27 am
In the recent South African Supreme Court case of Scholtz & others v The State 2018, ZASCA, the court noted that in determining the existence of corruption, the view is that “corruption is all too often an issue which has to be determined by way of inference drawn from the proven facts. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:12 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Sword and Shield: As discussed below, sword and shield should not be available as a defense anymore in light of section 8.01-223.1 of the Virginia Code, as interpreted in Travis v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Sword and Shield: As discussed below, sword and shield should not be available as a defense anymore in light of section 8.01-223.1 of the Virginia Code, as interpreted in Travis v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm
In light of the foregoing Federal and state statutes and regulations, it is clear that Hammond did not jeopardize her own eligibility for Medicaid by transferring her monthly income into the SNT for the benefit of her son, who was both disabled and under 65 years of age (see Reames v State of Oklahoma, 411 F3d at 1164; Estate Planning for a Family with a Special Needs Child, 23 Probate & Property at 16). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:53 pm
Privacy Shield Framework. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Curiously footnote 9 comes back with a pretty mixed bag of conclusions which reflect little to no consistency between the states and a common acceptance that juvenile proceedings and adoptions can be shielded from the public. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:31 am
Shields v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:37 pm
See, Watters v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:04 am
See, Watters v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
However, the Court of Appeals instructs that FOIL is to be "liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Town of Waterford v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:03 am
I was reminded of this by the Ninth Circuit’s decision yesterday in DB Healthcare v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:49 am
United States Polo Association v. [read post]
