Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 7,272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
., Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
In quashing that decision, the Court stated that: It is important to impress upon the Board that, at least where it is ordering the very serious penalty of cancelling a taxicab driver’s licence and thereby depriving the holder of earning a livelihood, it must provide reasons for its decision. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:13 am
A recent published appellate opinion addressed the sufficiency of a will to negate a right of survivorship for a joint brokerage account.Placencia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:30 am
For example, the copyright holder can also sue for copyright infringement, which could increase damages by as much as $150,000. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 5:55 pm
And in Spansion v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
You represent a large equity holder in the debtor’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:07 pm
Eric Holder, Jr. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:22 pm
" The case is Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
Attorney General Holder’s admirable leadership toward sentencing reform should lead him to refocus his attention on prior felony informations. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
Unsuccessful: Lahoti v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
by Dennis Crouch In WesternGeco v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
Holder 13-323Issue: Whether 8 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Justice Elena Kagan, writing for a unanimous court in Judulang v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 12:47 pm
Related Cases: Capitol v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:20 am
(also captioned v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:31 am
Holder and Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Must Articles 17 and 19 of Directive 98/71 be interpreted as meaning that the discretion accorded to the Member State to establish independently the extent to which, and the conditions under which, protection is conferred may include discretion to preclude such protection where a third party - without authorisation from the design copyright holder - has already produced and marketed in that State products based on the designs in question, where protection is precluded… [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:27 am
In Verizon Communications Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
Lord Justice Arnold recapped the current position in England and Wales with regards to website-blocking, noting 20th Century Fox v BT (Newzbin 2) wherein he granted the first such injunction in 2011, and the first application and injunction in relation to trade marks in Cartier v Sky. [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:06 am
Those new restrictions were imposed by the Commission measure and the member States implementing it were left with no discretion as to how to apply it (see, Case C-386/96 P Dreyfus v. [read post]
