Search for: "State v. List"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 27,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am
The State applied to, or courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:04 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
**Accordingly, said the court, the remedy sought in this second lawsuit “does not comport” with the merit and fitness mandate set out in Article V, Section 6 of the New York State Constitution.The court’s rationale: “Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the original lists had no legal existence and thus could not have expired. [read post]
1 May 2008, 9:02 am
The formal transfer list will follow later this week, but the ILB has received notice that four* cases have been granted transfer: James Butler v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:39 am
" State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:03 am
The Supreme Court has published a list of the results of recent permission to appeal hearings. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
") Dissent SC18670 - State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:32 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:30 pm
United StatesIssue: Whether criminal defendants must object at the time a sentence is imposed in order to challenge the sentence as either procedurally or substantively unreasonable under United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm
State law Claims: The court dismisses the state law claims on preemption grounds. __ Is this Oracle v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
[The walls are closing on universal, non-party injunctions against state laws. ] Labrador v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:22 am
AC33528 - State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:41 am
") AC35815 - State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:39 am
") AC35606 - State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:45 pm
The Supreme Court announced that principle in 1997, in Printz v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:49 pm
The Court invited the Michigan Association of Bankers, the Real Property Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, and the Consumer Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan to file briefs amicus curiae. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
That decision, Combs, et al. v. [read post]
