Search for: "State v. Saide" Results 2361 - 2380 of 57,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 2:12 am by traceydennis
R (Ghai) v Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (Ramgharia Gurdwara, Hitchin and others intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 59; [2010] WLR (D) 36 “The aims of the provisions of the Cremation Act 1902 were to ensure that cremations were subject to uniform rules throughout the country, to enable the Secretary of State to regulate the manner and places in which cremations were carried out, to require a crematorium to be a building which was appropriately equipped and to ensure that a… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:06 am by Sheldon Toplitt
L. 6, 65 P.S. secs. 67.101-67.3104].As reported on the Web site of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (www.rcfp.org), the 14-page decision of the Court in Pennsylvania State Troopers Assn. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”§76.4 of the Civil Service Law, in pertinent part, provides that §§75 and 76 of the Civil Service Law relating to the removal or suspension of “officers or employees in the competitive class of the civil service of thestate or any civil  division” may be supplemented,   modified or replaced by agreements negotiated between the state and an employee organization  pursuant  to  Article 15 of the Civil Service Law.In… [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
" Turning to the authorities, Mr Justice Moylan stated (at paragraph 61): "My task is to determine "the division of property which best achieves the fair overall outcome": Charman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Finally, the Court found by majority that the procedure prescribed by section 12(1) of the SIA is a proportiate and conforms to the requirements of international law, and cannot therefore be said to infringe article 6 of the ECHR. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm by Old Fox
"I believe in forgiveness," she said. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]