Search for: "State v. Word" Results 2361 - 2380 of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2008, 9:47 am
It seems fitting that Justice John Paul Stevens chose Chattanooga for his 1st public comments since he declared that capital punishment is unconstitutional with these words in Baze v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Tom Pritchard
Justice Ramsey ruled against the Council stating that the word “default” meant default in relation to the provisions of the 1984 Act and not the 1957 or 1974 Acts. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:24 pm
He'll instead be "educated" in a federal prison for the next 20 years -- in other words, until he's 107. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:14 am by gmlevine
Tatra, a.s. has national trademark registrations for TATRA in the United States and the European Community and is also the owner of a number of other TATRA and TATRA-family trademark registrations around the word, including the International Trademark Registry. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:09 am
Below are some samples of their work: STOPPING THE OBSCENITY MADNESS 50 YEARS AFTER ROTH V. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 10:23 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Unfortunately, even cases that are favorable to plaintiffs employ a fact-based (in the court’s word “holistic”) test. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Whilst an implication is something conveyed to the reader by the words used by the writer (i.e. flowing from what is expressly stated), an inference is a conclusion drawn by the reader as a result of a process of deductive reasoning undertaken by him/her, often including extraneous facts or based on moral/political value. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]