Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm
When such appointments are made in the United States the judicial record of the appointee is subject to minute analysis over many months. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:10 am
Mendoza has updated the abstract of her paper, The Thirteen Known Latina Litigants Before the Supreme Court of the United States, on SSRN. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:01 am
S., at 342 (emphasis deleted; internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:25 pm
Problem 17 --State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
The contested patents involve a compound patent owned by Gilead and a second medical use patent owned by the government of the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:03 pm
For example, it suggests that United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:48 pm
" United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:58 am
This case is of particular interest to securities litigators because it is one of several cases since the landmark Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
This is an unusual qui tam action, United States of America, Fair Laboratory Practices Associates v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
That profound change starting in the 14th century marks the character and premises of modern “law” in the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:58 pm
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:15 pm
Busby v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974; Administrative Procedure Act) United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
His recent attempt to register “Eat More Kale” with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), however, irked Georgia-based Chick-fil-A, which sent him a cease-and-desist letter claiming the marks are confusingly similar, according to press accounts. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
Another change was the introduction of a clause allowing the intelligence community to obtain an emergency exception to spy within the United States on a “non-United States person” for 72 hours—without any court order. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The most interesting supplemental brief was filed by the United States. [read post]
