Search for: "3 NY3d 1"
Results 221 - 240
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Additionally, the factual portion and any accompanying depositions must provide reasonable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense charged, as well as nonhearsay factual allegations of an evidentiary character which, if true, establish every element of the offense charged and defendant's commission thereof (CPL 100.15[3] & 100.40[1]; see People v Dumas, 68 NY2d 729 [1986]; see also People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133 [1987]). [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:36 am
Co., 1 NY3d at 68-69). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:26 am
Bank & Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591 [2005]). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:55 am
Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100)." [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
The notice requirement is excused when a defendant moves for suppression of the identification testimony (CPL § 710.30[3]; People v Merrill, 87 NY2d 948; see also, People v Lopez, 84 NY2d 425). [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
Co., 10 NY3d 200, 203 (2008).2Bi-Economy Mkt., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
Group, Inc., 30 NY3d 288, 298). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
The three are: (1) alleging proximate cause, (2) Subsequent attorney principles, and (3) account stated. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The legislature amended Civil Service Law § 167 (1) to codify the negotiated contribution rates for qualifying employees who retired after January 1, 1983, but the amendment did not change the State's contribution rates for qualifying employees who had retired before that date (see L 1983, ch 14, § 1). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The legislature amended Civil Service Law § 167 (1) to codify the negotiated contribution rates for qualifying employees who retired after January 1, 1983, but the amendment did not change the State's contribution rates for qualifying employees who had retired before that date (see L 1983, ch 14, § 1). [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 4:29 am
Co., 1 NY3d 64; Matter of Allstate Ins. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
V Signor, 5 NY3d 435, 440 [2005], quoting Buffalo News, 84 NY2d at 492). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
V Signor, 5 NY3d 435, 440 [2005], quoting Buffalo News, 84 NY2d at 492). [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
West of counsel), for respondents.Fisher, J.(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Robert J. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
West of counsel), for respondents.Fisher, J.(1) Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Robert J. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Examples include:1. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:06 pm
Co., 1 NY3d at 70; Morath v New York Cent. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:08 pm
Defendant admitted his commission of the two violations set forth in the petition, in exchange for a sentencing promise of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years, and the court ordered an updated presentence report. [read post]
24 May 2018, 3:55 am
(General Business Law § 352-h; 13 NYCRR 20.3 [o] [2], [3] [xii].) [read post]
