Search for: "A. R. v. State Department of Human Resources"
Results 221 - 240
of 734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Stanley Fish This brief essay was delivered as a response to a paper co-written by Justice Thomas R. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Stanley Fish This brief essay was delivered as a response to a paper co-written by Justice Thomas R. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:59 am
The several post-termination statements that he claimed were defamatory—including a letter from the VP of human resources detailing the reasons for his discharge and the company’s position statement to the EEOC—were never “published” and his claim for damages was completely at odds with the evidence (Javery v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
”[14] The worldwide expansion of human rights-related litigation in recent years is documented by the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, which has established a special legal accountability port [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 12:19 pm
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) under the Obama Administration issued a joint Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals (“HR Guidance,” available here). [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
Canada In the case of R v Jones 2017 SCC 60, the Supreme Court held that text messages may attract a reasonable expectation of privacy even after they have been sent and received. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:03 pm
We are working with Toyo (human resources) to determine how many people potentially may have been affected. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Last Friday, the Solicitor General filed a self-described “Petition for a Writ of Certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:00 am
This is probably why the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) steadfastly opposed AB 450, stating: “[W]hile well intentioned, [AB 450] will add a host of unnecessary burdensome requirements, create many logistical challenges, and could possibly force human resource professionals to decide between abiding by federal law or state law. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
This is probably why the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) steadfastly opposed AB 450, stating: “[W]hile well intentioned, [AB 450] will add a host of unnecessary burdensome requirements, create many logistical challenges, and could possibly force human resource professionals to decide between abiding by federal law or state law. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
This is probably why the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) steadfastly opposed AB 450, stating: “[W]hile well intentioned, [AB 450] will add a host of unnecessary burdensome requirements, create many logistical challenges, and could possibly force human resource professionals to decide between abiding by federal law or state law. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 7:30 am
Department of Human Resources (DCHR) to identify “high-risk or sensitive” positions at the facility. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
On 11 October 2017 Karen Bradley, the Secretary of State for Digital [sic], Culture, Media and Sport gave evidence to House of Commons Committee which covers her department. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday, A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
The suit, Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
